62 N.E. 784 (Ill. 1902), Chicago & A. Ry. Co. v. Eaton

Citation: 62 N.E. 784, 194 Ill. 441

Opinion Judge: [194 Ill. 443] HAND, J.

Party Name: CHICAGO & A. RY. CO. v. EATON.

Attorney: Defendant's first and second instructions, which were changed by the court, were that, if the jury believed that the 'conduct' of the deceased contributed to his injury, plaintiff could not recover. Defendant's third instruction, which was changed by the court, was that, if the jury believed that...

Case Date: February 21, 1902

Court: Illinois Supreme Court