62 Cal.2d 598, 28334, Nichols v. Hast

Citation: 62 Cal.2d 598, 43 Cal.Rptr. 641, 400 P.2d 753

Opinion Judge: [9] Traynor

Party Name: Nichols v. Hast

Attorney: [7] Morgan, Holzhauer, Burrows, Wenzel & Lynberg, Albert J. Holzhauer and Stanley R. Rader for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Hollopeter & Terry and Don H. Terry for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Friday April 16, 1965

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

62 Cal.2d 598, 28334, Nichols v. Hast

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 32 Cal.2d 763, 20369, Sampsell v. Superior Court
California - 33 Cal.2d 153, 20219, Webber v. Webber
California - 48 Cal.2d 617, 24271, Lamoreux v. San Diego Etc. Ry. Co.
California - 61 Cal.2d 738, 21675, Malkasian v. Irwin
California - 117 Cal.App.2d 66, 15381, Bauer v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.

See all quotations