619 A.2d 676 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1993), Pizzo Mantin Group v. Township of Randolph

Citation: 619 A.2d 676, 261 N.J.Super. 659

Opinion Judge: [11] Havey

Party Name: PIZZO MANTIN GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH and The Planning Board of the Township of Randolph, Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: [7] Douglas R. Henshaw argued the cause for appellant (Henshaw & Brady, attorneys; Mr. Henshaw of counsel and on the brief with Rosella E. Nichay).

Case Date: February 04, 1993

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

619 A.2d 676 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1993), Pizzo Mantin Group v. Township of Randolph

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 130 A.2d 847 (N.J. 1957), A-104, Ardolino v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Florham Park
New Jersey - 173 A.2d 391 (N.J. 1961), A--92, Levin v. Livingston Tp.
New Jersey - 205 A.2d 445 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1964), A--989, Popular Refreshments, Inc. v. Fuller's Milk Bar & Recreation Center, Inc.
New Jersey - 209 A.2d 143 (N.J. 1965), Popular Refreshments, Inc. v. Fuller's Milk Bar and Recreation Center
New Jersey - 212 A.2d 153 (N.J. 1965), A--111, Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, Sea Girt

See all quotations