61 S.E.2d 779 (Ga.App. 1950), 33095, Ray v. State

Citation: 61 S.E.2d 779, 82 Ga.App. 550

Party Name: RAY v. STATE.

Attorney: 3. The alleged newly discovered evidence was merely cumulative and impeaching in character and its introduction on a new trial would probably not produce a different verdict on another trial., Briggs Carson, Jr., Tifton, for plaintiff in error., J. Bowie Gray, Sol. Gen., Tifton, for defendant in ...

Case Date: Thursday October 26, 1950

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

61 S.E.2d 779 (Ga.App. 1950), 33095, Ray v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 120 S.E. 649 (Ga.App. 1923), 14823, Browning v. State
Georgia - 13 S.E. 556 (Ga. 1891), Pool v. State
Georgia - 18 S.E. 823 (Ga. 1893), Cook v. State
Georgia - 187 S.E. 674 (Ga.App. 1936), 25764, Morris v. State
Georgia - 20 S.E. 250 (Ga. 1894), Wallace v. State

See all quotations