61 N.W. 445 (S.D. 1894), Austin, Tomlinson & Webster Mfg. Co. v. Heiser

Citation: 61 N.W. 445, 6 S.D. 429

Opinion Judge: CORSON, P. J. Before the commencement of the trial, the counsel for the defendant Heiser moved the court to require the plaintiff to elect upon which cause of action he would proceed to trial, upon the ground that there were several causes of action stated in the complaint, but not stated separately, as required by the practice act. While, possibly

Party Name: AUSTIN, TOMLINSON & WEBSTER MANUF'G CO. v. HEISER et al.

Attorney: G. P. Harben, for appellant. Joe Kirby, for respondent.

Case Date: December 29, 1894

Court: South Dakota Supreme Court