61 Cal.App.3d 872, 36409, Anthony v. Enzler

Citation: 61 Cal.App.3d 872, 132 Cal.Rptr. 553

Opinion Judge: [10] Kane

Party Name: Anthony v. Enzler

Attorney: [7] Richard V. Smith and Richard F. Swisher for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Buchman, Kass & Morgan and Kenneth M. Miller for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: September 15, 1976

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

61 Cal.App.3d 872, 36409, Anthony v. Enzler

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 156 Cal. 359, L. A. 2,186, Smith v. Bangham
California - 31 Cal.2d 766, 19887, Warner Bros. Pictures v. Brodel
California - 37 Cal.2d 274, 21508, Brokaw v. Black-Foxe Military Institute
California - 43 Cal.2d 310, 23175, Dawson v. Goff
California - 55 Cal.2d 430, 26080, Thayer v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.

See all quotations