602 P.2d 264 (Or. 1979), SC 25992, Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

Citation: 602 P.2d 264, 288 Or. 39

Opinion Judge: LENT, J.

Party Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Clair STUPFEL, Petitioner, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.

Attorney: Thomas A. Caruso, of Welch, Bruun, Green & Caruso, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner. Marshall C. Cheney, of Cheney & Kelley, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. Steven C. Yates and Evohl F. Malagon, Eugene, filed a brief Amicus Curiae for The ...

Case Date: November 06, 1979

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

602 P.2d 264 (Or. 1979), SC 25992, Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - 469 P.2d 25 (Or. 1970), Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood Co.
Oregon Caselaw - 491 P.2d 997 (Or. 1971), Sahnow v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
Oregon Caselaw - 581 P.2d 961 (Or.App. 1978), CA 10711, Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.
Oregon Caselaw - 584 P.2d 371 (Or.App. 1978), CA 10190, WCB 76-6467, Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
Oregon Caselaw - 602 P.2d 259 (Or. 1979), SC 25785, Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.