602 A.2d 613 (Conn.App. 1992), 10148, Norooz v. Inland Wetlands Agency of Town of Woodbury

Citation: 602 A.2d 613, 26 Conn.App. 564

Opinion Judge: DUPONT, C.J.

Party Name: Sedigheh NOROOZ, et al. v. INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY OF the TOWN OF WOODBURY, et al.

Attorney: Maureen Danehy Cox, with whom, on the brief, was William F. Holland, Waterbury, for appellant (named defendant)., David B. Harting, Middlebury, for appellees (plaintiffs). Maureen Danehy Cox, with whom, on the brief, was William F. Holland, for the appellant (named defendant). David B. Harting, ...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before DUPONT, CJ, and EDWARD Y O'CONNELL and LAVERY

Case Date: Tuesday February 04, 1992

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

602 A.2d 613 (Conn.App. 1992), 10148, Norooz v. Inland Wetlands Agency of Town of Woodbury

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New York - 34 Misc.2d 281, Wunder v. Macomber
Connecticut - 143 A.2d 639 (Conn. 1958), Yurdin v. Town Plan and Zoning Commission of Town of Fairfield
Connecticut - 225 A.2d 637 (Conn. 1967), Miklus v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Fairfield
Connecticut - 230 A.2d 595 (Conn. 1967), Kyser v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Westport
Connecticut - 232 A.2d 916 (Conn. 1967), Parish of St. Andrew's Protestant Episcopal Church v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Stamford

See all quotations