60 S.E.2d 243 (Ga. 1950), 17180, Williams v. Russell

Citation: 60 S.E.2d 243, 207 Ga. 220

Opinion Judge: ALMAND, Justice.

Party Name: WILLIAMS v. RUSSELL et al.

Attorney: The only question for decision being whether the trial court erred in rendering a judgment, based on the report of an auditor, distributing funds in the hands of a receiver, and such question being one of law only, the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction, and the case is transferred to the Cour...

Case Date: July 12, 1950

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

60 S.E.2d 243 (Ga. 1950), 17180, Williams v. Russell

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 152 S.E. 98 (Ga. 1930), 7160, Henderson v. Lott
Georgia - 166 S.E. 646 (Ga. 1932), 8936, Brightwell v. Oglethorpe Tel. Co.
Georgia - 191 S.E. 445 (Ga. 1937), 11794, Henley v. Colonial Stages South, Inc.
Georgia - 46 S.E.2d 344 (Ga. 1948), 16060, Overstreet v. Schulman
Georgia - 49 S.E.2d 522 (Ga. 1948), 16313, Tucker v. American Surety Co. of New York

See all quotations