60 A.2d 626 (N.J. 1948), 240, Siegel v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark

Citation: 60 A.2d 626, 137 N.J.L. 423

Opinion Judge: BURLING, J.

Party Name: EDWARD W. SIEGEL AND OSCAR L. COHEN, PARTNERS TRADING AS COMMERCIAL OVERALL CLEANING COMPANY, PROSECUTORS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT

Attorney: For the prosecutors, Frank Fink. For the defendants, Thomas L. Parsonnet (Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).

Judge Panel: Before CASE, CHIEF JUSTICE, and Justices BURLING and JACOBS.

Case Date: Wednesday July 21, 1948

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

60 A.2d 626 (N.J. 1948), 240, Siegel v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 11 A.2d 304 (N.J. 1940), | Brandon v. The Board of Commissioners of The Town of Montclair
New Jersey - 15 A.2d 598 (N.J.L. 1940), | Brandon v. The Board of Commissioners of The Town of Montclair
New Jersey - 20 A.2d 649 (N.J. 1941), 267, Scaduto v. Town of Bloomfield
New Jersey - 43 A.2d 850 (N.J. 1945), 215, Potts v. Board of Adjustment of The Borough of Princeton
New Jersey - 54 A.2d 451 (N.J. 1947), 210, Sitgreaves v. Board of Adjustment of Town of Nutley

See all quotations