60 A.2d 133 (N.H. 1948), 3749, fortuna v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Manchester

Citation: 60 A.2d 133, 95 N.H. 211

Opinion Judge: BRANCH

Party Name: Elizabeth Fortuna v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Manchester, and Manchester Buick Company

Attorney: Sullivan & Wynot (Mr. Wynot orally), for the plaintiff. Warren, Wilson, Wiggin & Sundeen (Mr. Wiggin orally), for the Manchester Buick Company. Henry P. Sullivan, for the zoning board.

Judge Panel: Duncan, J., dissented, being of the opinion that the evidence cannot reasonably be held to satisfy the statutory prerequisites to authorization of a variance. R. L., c. 51, s. 62 (III): the others concurred.

Case Date: July 06, 1948

Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

60 A.2d 133 (N.H. 1948), 3749, fortuna v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Manchester

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Hampshire - 99 A. 293 (N.H. 1916), Village Precinct of Hanover v. Atkins
New Hampshire - 27 A.2d 105 (N.H. 1942), 3341, Vogel v. Board of Adjustment for the City of Manchester
New Hampshire - 42 A.2d 736 (N.H. 1945), 3497, Plourde v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Nashua
New Hampshire - 60 A.2d 136 (N.H. 1948), 3751, Mitchell v. Legarsky