598 A.2d 114 (Vt. 1990), 88-028, Handy v. City of Rutland

Citation: 598 A.2d 114, 156 Vt. 397

Opinion Judge: Peck, J.

Party Name: Paul L. HANDY and Catherine M. Handy v. CITY OF RUTLAND and Town of Rutland.

Attorney: Allen D. Webster and Mary G. Kirkpatrick of Lisman & Lisman, Burlington, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Henry C. Brislin, City Attorney, Rutland, for Defendants-Appellees.

Case Date: December 28, 1990

Court: Vermont Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

598 A.2d 114 (Vt. 1990), 88-028, Handy v. City of Rutland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 703 F.Supp. 1192 (E.D.N.C. 1988), 87-77-CIV-7, South Shell Inv. v. Town of Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina.
Arkansas - 302 S.W.2d 287 (Ark. 1957), 5-1248, Delony v. Rucker
Arizona - 581 P.2d 1148 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1978), 2 CA-CIV 2287, Payson Sanitary Dist. of Gila County v. Zimmerman
California - 42 Cal.3d 1172, 32091, Hansen v. City of San Buenaventura
Illinois - 522 N.E.2d 663 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1988), 86-3163, Bobrowicz v. City of Chicago

See all quotations