595 A.2d 928 (Conn.App. 1991), 9649, Crotty v. Borough of Naugatuck

Citation: 595 A.2d 928, 25 Conn.App. 599

Opinion Judge: FOTI, J.

Party Name: John CROTTY v. BOROUGH OF NAUGATUCK et al.

Attorney: Mary Beattie Schairer, with whom, on the brief, were Hugh Keefe, Donn A. Swift and John M. Walsh, for appellant (plaintiff)., Thomas J. Rechen, with whom, on the brief, was Anthony J. Natale, for appellees (defendants). Mary Beattie Schairer, with whom, on the brief, were Hugh Keefe, Donn A. Swi...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before EDWARD Y O'CONNEL, FOTI and LANDAU

Case Date: Tuesday August 27, 1991

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

595 A.2d 928 (Conn.App. 1991), 9649, Crotty v. Borough of Naugatuck

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 140 A. 728 (Conn. 1928), Ryerson v. A.E. Bounty Co.
Connecticut - 160 A.2d 120 (Conn. 1960), Farnham v. Labutis
Connecticut - 160 A.2d 480 (Conn. 1960), State v. De Gennaro
Connecticut - 398 A.2d 1161 (Conn. 1978), McNamara v. Town of Hamden
Connecticut - 443 A.2d 902 (Conn. 1982), Link v. City of Shelton

See all quotations