594 N.E.2d 1027 (Ohio App. 10 Dist. 1991), 90AP-848, Ohio Urology, Inc. v. Poll

Citation: 594 N.E.2d 1027, 72 Ohio App.3d 446

Opinion Judge: REILLY, Presiding Judge.

Party Name: OHIO UROLOGY, INC., Appellant, v. POLL, Appellee.

Attorney: Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Nancy L. Danison; and Leonard E. Kaplan, Columbus, for appellant. Burman & Robinson and Robert N. Burman, Chester, Hoffman, Willcox & Saxbe, John J. Chester, Charles R. Saxbe and Donald C. Brey, Columbus, for appellee. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Nancy L. Dan...

Judge Panel: BOWMAN and HENDERSON, JJ., concur.

Case Date: February 08, 1991

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

594 N.E.2d 1027 (Ohio App. 10 Dist. 1991), 90AP-848, Ohio Urology, Inc. v. Poll

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 348 A.2d 208 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1975), Dwyer v. Jung
New Jersey - 390 A.2d 1161 (N.J. 1978), Karlin v. Weinberg
Ohio - 105 N.E.2d 685 (Ohio Comm. 1952), 617926, Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland v. Witter
Ohio - 200 N.E.2d 297 (Ohio 1964), 38505, Extine v. Williamson Midwest, Inc.
Ohio - 325 N.E.2d 544 (Ohio 1975), 74-366, Raimonde v. Van Vlerah

See all quotations