59 N.W. 586 (Wis. 1894), Donkle v. Milem

Citation: 59 N.W. 586, 88 Wis. 33

Opinion Judge: SILAS U. PINNEY, J.

Party Name: DONKLE, Appellant, v. MILEM, Respondent

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by G. S. Martin, attorney, and Richmond & Smith, of counsel, and oral argument by J. B. Smith and G. S. Martin. For the respondent there was a brief by Smith & Buell, and oral argument by Rufus B. Smith.

Case Date: Friday May 25, 1894

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court