59 N.E.2d 37 (Ohio 1945), 30029, Borton v. Earhart

Citation: 59 N.E.2d 37, 144 Ohio St. 334

Opinion Judge: HART, J.

Party Name: BORTON v. EARHART et al.

Attorney: Grossman, Carter, Hamilton & Rosenman, of Cleveland, for appellant. As a part of her first cause of action, the plaintiff further alleged that the four defendants had, after the Earhart note had been given but before it became due, entered into a written agreement with her for a three-year extens...

Judge Panel: WEYGANDT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, BELL, TURNER, and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday January 10, 1945

Court: Ohio Supreme Court