59 Cal.App.3d 101, 2547, Bahten v. County of Merced

Citation: 59 Cal.App.3d 101, 130 Cal.Rptr. 539

Opinion Judge: [10] Goldstein

Party Name: Bahten v. County of Merced

Attorney: [7] Walkup, Downing & Sterns and Robert A. Seligson for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Coyle & Wayte, Lawrence E. Wayte and James P. Wagoner for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: June 15, 1976

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

59 Cal.App.3d 101, 2547, Bahten v. County of Merced

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 49 Cal.2d 243, 24421, Radar v. Rogers
California - 56 Cal.2d 596, 20690, Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.
California - 2 Cal.3d 575, 29715, Grudt v. City of Los Angeles
California - 217 Cal.App.2d 77, 20884, Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State
California - 271 Cal.App.2d 665, 33043, Wilson v. People By and Through Dept. of Public Works

See all quotations