59 Cal.2d 776, 20667, Hamer v. Town of Ross

Citation: 59 Cal.2d 776, 31 Cal.Rptr. 335, 382 P.2d 375

Opinion Judge: [10] Tobriner

Party Name: Hamer v. Town of Ross

Attorney: [7] Robert W. Elliott, City Attorney, Sturgis, Den-Dulk, Douglass & Anderson and Robert T. Anderson for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Kennedy, Bloom & Fletcher, Leonard J. Bloom and James M. Fletcher for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday June 13, 1963

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

59 Cal.2d 776, 20667, Hamer v. Town of Ross

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 195 Cal. 477, L. A. 8012, Miller v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles
California - 12 Cal.2d 244, 15581, Reynolds v. Barrett
California - 13 Cal.2d 280, 4167, People v. Lewis
California - 18 Cal.2d 341, 16619, Acker v. Baldwin
California - 28 Cal.2d 536, 19729, Danskin v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist.

See all quotations