59 Cal.2d 445, 7234, In re Loretizo

Citation: 59 Cal.2d 445, 30 Cal.Rptr. 16, 380 P.2d 656

Opinion Judge: [10] Mccomb

Party Name: In re Loretizo

Attorney: [7] Arthur Lewis for Petitioner. [8] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Philip E. Grey, Assistant City Attorney, and William E. Doran, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday April 18, 1963

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

59 Cal.2d 445, 7234, In re Loretizo

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 20 Cal.2d 366, 18150, Pipoly v. Benson
California - 39 Cal.2d 708, 6211, Tolman v. Underhill
California - 51 Cal.2d 1, 24734, Agnew v. City of Los Angeles
California - 53 Cal.2d 674, 25657, Abbott v. City of Los Angeles
California - 58 Cal.2d 117, 7078, In re Moss