59 A. 150 (N.J.L. 1904), Russell v. Erie Railroad Co.

Citation: 59 A. 150, 70 N.J.L. 808

Opinion Judge: VROOM, J.

Party Name: MAY C. RUSSELL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Attorney: For the plaintiff in error, Collins & Corbin. For the defendants in error, Copeland, Luce & Kip.

Judge Panel: For affirmance -- THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, DIXON, GARRISON, FORT, SWAYZE, BOGERT, VREDENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY. 11. For reversal -- None.

Case Date: Monday November 14, 1904

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

59 A. 150 (N.J.L. 1904), Russell v. Erie Railroad Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 112 Cal. 53, L. A. 52, San Diego v. Pacific Beach Co.
California - 20 Cal. 602, Blen v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.
California - 27 Cal. 11, Hooper v. Wells Fargo & Co.
New Jersey - 59 A. 459 (N.J.L. 1904), Vrooman v. The North Jersey Street Railway Co.
New York - 48 N.Y. 498, Nelson v. Hudson River Railroad Co.

See all quotations