586 P.2d 1313 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1978), 2 CA-CIV 2989, State v. Superior Court, In and For Pima County

Citation: 586 P.2d 1313, 120 Ariz. 501

Opinion Judge: [10] Hathaway

Party Name: The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF PIMA, and theHonorable Jack T. Arnold, Judge of the Superior Court, Respondent, and Alix R. Magid, Real Party in Interest.

Attorney: [7] Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Jesse J. Figueroa, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, and Tom Zouvada, Student under Rule 28(e), for petitioner. [8] Chandler, Tullar, Udall & Redhair, by Robert E. Lundquist, Tucson, for real party in interest.

Case Date: September 25, 1978

Court: Arizona Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

586 P.2d 1313 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1978), 2 CA-CIV 2989, State v. Superior Court, In and For Pima County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arizona - 398 P.2d 671 (Ariz. 1965), 8001, State Farm Ins. Co. v. Roberts
Arizona - 508 P.2d 78 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1973), 2 CA-CIV 1316, Independent Gin Co., Inc. v. Parker
Arizona - 544 P.2d 204 (Ariz. 1975), 12293, Butler v. Doyle
Colorado - 531 P.2d 632 (Colo. 1975), 26642, Bellmann v. District Court In and For Arapahoe County in Eighteenth Judicial Dist.
Illinois - 197 N.E.2d 15 (Ill. 1964), 37951, People v. Ryan

See all quotations