586 A.2d 334 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1991), Esdaile v. Hartsfield

Citation: 586 A.2d 334, 245 N.J.Super. 591

Opinion Judge: [10] Michels

Party Name: Laverne ESDAILE, Plaintiff-Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. Winzel HARTSFIELD, Defendant, and Hazel Frank Gluck, on behalf of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

Attorney: [7] Richard J. Mirra argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Boglioli & O'Mara, attorneys; William Pfister, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).

Case Date: February 08, 1991

Court: New Jersey Superior Court