585 A.2d 1260 (Conn.App. 1991), 8964, Matey v. City of Waterbury

Citation: 585 A.2d 1260, 24 Conn.App. 93

Opinion Judge: FOTI, J.

Party Name: Mary Lou MATEY v. CITY OF WATERBURY et al.

Attorney: Michael J. Belzer, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, Atty. Gen., and Charles Overend, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant (second injury and compensation assurance fund)., Laurence V. Parnoff, Bridgeport, with whom, on the brief, was David A. Scalzi, Stamford, for ap...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before DUPONT, CJ, and SPALLONE and FOTI

Case Date: February 12, 1991

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

585 A.2d 1260 (Conn.App. 1991), 8964, Matey v. City of Waterbury

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 193 A. 204 (Conn. 1937), Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp. of Waterbury
Connecticut - 84 A. 314 (Conn. 1912), City of Bristol v. Bristol Water Co.
Connecticut - 157 A.2d 494 (Conn.Super. 1959), 89848, Lytwinick v. Lytwinick
Connecticut - 480 A.2d 552 (Conn. 1984), Barra v. Ridgefield Card and Gift Gallery, Ltd.
Connecticut - 493 A.2d 297 (Conn.App. 1985), 3318, Commissioner of Revenue Services v. Estate of Culpeper

See all quotations