584 A.2d 797 (N.J. 1991), Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

Citation: 584 A.2d 797, 122 N.J. 228

Opinion Judge: [10] Per Curiam

Party Name: The DIXON VENTURE, A New Jersey Partnership, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE COMPANY, a New Jersey Corporation, Dixon Ticonderoga Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Their Successors and Assigns, Defendants-Appellants.

Attorney: [7] Julian Wilsey argued the cause for appellants (Greenberg Margolis, attorneys).

Case Date: January 30, 1991

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

584 A.2d 797 (N.J. 1991), Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 256 A.2d 803 (N.J.Super.L. 1969), Medivox Productions, Inc. v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.
New Jersey - 561 A.2d 663 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1989), Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.
New Jersey - 89 A.2d 264 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), Nos. A--46, A--47, Edwards v. Leopoldi
New Jersey - 91 A.2d 671 (N.J. 1952), Edwards v. Leopoldi