583 N.E.2d 1129 (Ohio Ct.Cl. 1991), 89-11406, Williams v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Citation: 583 N.E.2d 1129, 61 Ohio Misc.2d 699

Opinion Judge: FRED J. SHOEMAKER, Judge.

Party Name: WILLIAMS v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION.

Attorney: Lee I. Fisher, Atty. Gen., and Christopher C. Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, for defendant. [61 Ohio Misc.2d 701] Daniel R. Williams, pro se. Lee I. Fisher, Atty. Gen., and Christopher C. Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, for defendant.

Case Date: Friday April 12, 1991

Court: Ohio Court of Claims

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

583 N.E.2d 1129 (Ohio Ct.Cl. 1991), 89-11406, Williams v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 101 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1951), McNees v. Cincinnati St. Ry. Co.
Ohio - 105 N.E.2d 429 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1950), In re Fahle's Estate
Ohio - 144 N.E.2d 303 (Ohio App. 4 Dist. 1957), Justice v. Rose
Ohio - 209 N.E.2d 142 (Ohio 1965), 38780, Smith v. United Properties, Inc.
Ohio - 303 N.E.2d 81 (Ohio 1973), 73-51, Presley v. City of Norwood

See all quotations