581 A.2d 1328 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1990), Swarts v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Citation: 581 A.2d 1328, 244 N.J.Super. 170

Opinion Judge: [10] Muir

Party Name: Daniel C. SWARTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

Attorney: [7] Corinne L. McGovern argued the cause for appellant (DeLeonardis, McGovern & Dermody, attorneys).

Case Date: October 16, 1990

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Extract

581 A.2d 1328 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1990), Swarts v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

This document cites

Federal Cases - 875 F.2d 399 (2nd Cir. 1989), 1026, Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.
Federal Cases - 809 F.2d 539 (8th Cir. 1987), 86-5020, Lancaster v. Buerkle Buick Honda Co.
Federal Cases - 856 F.2d 514 (3rd Cir. 1988), 87-3222, Coventry v. United States Steel Corp.
Federal Cases - 862 F.2d 448 (3rd Cir. 1988), 88-1009, Cirillo v. Arco Chemical Co., a Div. of Atlantic Richfield Co.
Federal Cases - 479 U.S. 850 (1986), 86-96, Eastman Kodak Co. v. Polaroid Corp.