580 A.2d 1374 (Pa.Super. 1990), Keech v. Mead Johnson and Co.

Citation: 580 A.2d 1374, 398 Pa.Super. 329

Opinion Judge: Author: Popovich

Party Name: Harvey Lee KEECH and Suzanne M. Keech, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Daniel Keech, a Minor, Appellants, v. MEAD JOHNSON AND COMPANY, Bristol-Myers U.S. Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Group, Mead Johnson Nutritionals, a/k/a Mead Johnson Nutritional, a/k/a Mead Johnson Nutritional Division, a/k/a Mead Johnson Nutritionals Divis

Case Date: Friday October 12, 1990

Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

580 A.2d 1374 (Pa.Super. 1990), Keech v. Mead Johnson and Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 717 F.Supp. 1081 (E.D.Pa. 1989), Civ. A. 89-1891, Karibjanian v. Thomas Jefferson University Hosp.
Georgia - 218 S.E.2d 661 (Ga.App. 1975), 50751, Flynn v. Reaves
New York - 131 A.D.2d 631, Fanelli v. Adler
New York - 124 Misc.2d 971, Zuckerman v. Antenucci
Pennsylvania - 223 A.2d 663 (Pa. 1966), Gray v. Grunnagle

See all quotations