58 S.E.2d 168 (Ga. 1950), 16902, Lively v. Lively

Citation: 58 S.E.2d 168, 206 Ga. 606

Party Name: LIVELY v. LIVELY et al.

Attorney: It is not subject to attack upon the ground that it does not conform to the contract. The contract was in evidence, and this complaint can be urged only in an attack upon the verdict under the general grounds., This case is one for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of land....

Case Date: February 17, 1950

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

58 S.E.2d 168 (Ga. 1950), 16902, Lively v. Lively

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 126 S.E. 480 (Ga. 1925), 4182, Reeves v. Lancaster
Georgia - 2 S.E.2d 102 (Ga. 1939), 12484, Clifton v. State
Georgia - 40 S.E.2d 62 (Ga. 1946), 15476, Lively v. Munday
Georgia - 57 S.E.2d 917 (Ga. 1950), 16953, Cannon v. Fulton Nat. Bank
Georgia - 6 S.E.2d 788 (Ga. 1940), 13121, Lewis v. Foy