58 N.W. 79 (Wis. 1894), Anderson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
Citation:
58 N.W. 79, 87 Wis. 195
Opinion Judge:
PINNEY, J.
Party Name:
ANDERSON, Respondent, v. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant
Attorney:
For the appellant there was a brief by Tomkins & Merrill and S. L. Perrin, and oral argument by W. M. Tomkins and Thos. Wilson. For the respondent there was a brief by John F. Dufur and Cate, Jones & Sanborn, and oral argument by John F. Dufur and D. Lloyd Jones.
Judge Panel:
SILAS U. PINNEY, J. HARLOW S. ORTON, C. J., dissented. ORTON ORTON, C. J.
