578 A.2d 167 (Conn.App. 1990), 8560, Cashman v. Sullivan and Donegan, P.C.

Citation: 578 A.2d 167, 23 Conn.App. 24

Opinion Judge: DALY, J.

Party Name: William H. CASHMAN v. SULLIVAN AND DONEGAN, P.C.

Attorney: William H. Cashman, pro se., Roger Sullivan, pro se. William H. Cashman, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Roger Sullivan, pro se, the appellee (defendant).

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before SPALLONE, DALY and NORCOTT

Case Date: Tuesday August 28, 1990

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

578 A.2d 167 (Conn.App. 1990), 8560, Cashman v. Sullivan and Donegan, P.C.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 325 A.2d 274 (Conn. 1973), Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Southern New England Contracting Co.
Connecticut - 357 A.2d 466 (Conn. 1975), Waterbury Bd. of Ed. v. Waterbury Teachers Ass'n
Connecticut - 440 A.2d 774 (Conn. 1981), Bic Pen Corp. v. Local No. 134, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America
Connecticut - 523 A.2d 1271 (Conn. 1987), 12964, O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3
Connecticut - 525 A.2d 112 (Conn.App. 1987), 4657, Town of East Hartford v. East Hartford Mun. Employees Union, Inc.

See all quotations