574 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio App. 11 Dist. 1989), 4076, Reder v. Antenucci

Citation: 574 N.E.2d 1137, 62 Ohio App.3d 139

Opinion Judge: CHRISTLEY, Presiding Judge.

Party Name: REDER et al., Appellants, v. ANTENUCCI, Appellee. [*]

Attorney: James L. Pazol, Youngstown, for appellants Joachim Reder and Fritz Reder & Sons Sports Car et al., David C. Comstock, Youngstown, for appellee. James L. Pazol, for appellants Joachim Reder and Fritz Reder & Sons Sports Car et al., David C. Comstock, for appellee.

Judge Panel: MILLIGAN, J., concurs. FORD, J., concurs in judgment only.

Case Date: April 10, 1989

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

574 N.E.2d 1137 (Ohio App. 11 Dist. 1989), 4076, Reder v. Antenucci

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 138 N.E.2d 389 (Ohio 1956), 34764, Muckus v. Ruggles
Ohio - 181 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio App. 7 Dist. 1961), Bingham v. Hartman
Ohio - 224 N.E.2d 144 (Ohio App. 2 Dist. 1966), Younce v. Baker
Ohio - 224 N.E.2d 165 (Ohio App. 2 Dist. 1967), Thomas v. Keller
Ohio - 227 N.E.2d 212 (Ohio 1967), 40384, State v. DeHass

See all quotations