57 S.E.2d 470 (S.C. 1950), 16315, Scott v. Scott

Citation: 57 S.E.2d 470, 216 S.C. 280

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: SCOTT v. SCOTT et al.

Attorney: Messrs. McDonald & McGowan, of Florence, for Appellant, cite: As to where a deed was procured by undue influence, it is immaterial that in the procurement thereof the immediate beneficiary did not participate or that a third person acted with the beneficiary in exercising such undue influence: 16...

Case Date: Friday February 03, 1950

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

57 S.E.2d 470 (S.C. 1950), 16315, Scott v. Scott

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 20 S.E.2d 741 (S.C. 1942), 15426, All v. Prillaman
South Carolina - 24 S.E.2d 168 (S.C. 1943), 15501, Dominick v. Rhodes
South Carolina - 39 S.E.2d 787 (S.C. 1946), 15875, Page v. Lewis
South Carolina - 56 S.E.2d 343 (S.C. 1949), 16274, Wolfe v. Wolfe
South Carolina - 57 S.E.2d 477 (S.C. 1950), 16316, Watson v. Wannamaker