57 N.W. 973 (Wis. 1894), Summerfield v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
Citation:
57 N.W. 973, 87 Wis. 1
Opinion Judge:
WINSLOW, J.
Party Name:
SUMMERFIELD, Respondent, v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Appellant
Attorney:
For the appellant there was a brief by Catlin & Butler and Carl C. Pope, and La Follette, Harper, Roe & Zimmerman, attorneys, and Geo. H. Fearons, of counsel, and the cause was argued orally by G. E. Roe. For the respondent there was a brief by McHugh, Lyons & Mclntosh, and oral argument by Thos....
Judge Panel:
JOHN B. WINSLOW, J. JOHN B. CASSODAY, J., concurred and dissented in part. CASSODAY CASSODAY CASSODAY, J. I fully concur in all that is said by my Brother WINSLOW in this case, except as to the effect to be given to ch. 171, Laws of 1885 (sec. 1770b, S. & B. Ann. Stats.). That statute in express ...
