57 N.W. 783 (N.D. 1894), 6731, Rosholt v. Mehus

Citation: 57 N.W. 783, 3 N.D. 513

Opinion Judge: BARTHOLOMEW, C. J.

Party Name: JULIUS ROSHOLT v. THEA MEHUS

Attorney: F. W. Ames and Carmody & Leslie, for appellant. J. H. Bosard, for respondent.

Judge Panel: BARTHOLOMEW, C. J. CORLISS, J., (concurring.) CORLISS CORLISS, J., (concurring.) The respondent, in effect, claims that she had the right, after she had ceased to be the wife of the owner of the property used by them both as a homestead, to eject her former husband therefrom, notwithstanding the ...

Case Date: Monday January 08, 1894

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court