57 Cal.App.3d 889, 47303, City of Los Angeles v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Citation: 57 Cal.App.3d 889, 129 Cal.Rptr. 485

Opinion Judge: [10] Thompson

Party Name: City of Los Angeles v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Attorney: [7] Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Carl K. Newton for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Burt Pines, City Attorney, Edward C. Farrell, Chief Assistant City Attorney, and Roger D. Weisman, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Friday April 30, 1976

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

57 Cal.App.3d 889, 47303, City of Los Angeles v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 151 Cal. 425, L. A. 1799, Colegrove Water Company v. City of Hollywood
California - 17 Cal.2d 576, 16759, Pasadena v. California-Michigan Etc. Co.
California - 58 Cal.2d 513, 26198, Dolske v. Gormley
California - 208 Cal.App.2d 338, 26014, City of Los Angeles v. Igna
California - 28 Cal.App.2d 164, 10841, Dierssen v. McCormack

See all quotations