57 A.2d 138 (Conn. 1948), Meadow v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.

Citation: 57 A.2d 138, 134 Conn. 269

Opinion Judge: DICKENSON, Judge.

Party Name: MEADOW v. WINCHESTER REPEATING ARMS CO.

Attorney: George E. Beers and Edward S. Snyder, both of New Haven, for appellant (plaintiff). Joseph V. Fay, Jr., of Hartford (Harrison D. Schofield, of Hartford, on the brief), for appellee (defendant).

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other Judges concurred. Before MALTBIE, C.J., and BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS, and DICKENSON, JJ.

Case Date: January 09, 1948

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

57 A.2d 138 (Conn. 1948), Meadow v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 114 A. 109 (Conn. 1921), Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.
Connecticut - 130 A. 705 (Conn. 1925), Galway v. Doody Steel Erecting Co.
Connecticut - 137 A. 26 (Conn. 1927), Gonirenki v. American Steel & Wire Co.
Connecticut - 154 A. 431 (Conn. 1931), Wysocki v. Bradley & Hubbard Co.
Connecticut - 157 A. 867 (Conn. 1932), Link v. State

See all quotations