562 A.2d 566 (Conn.App. 1989), 7532, In re Sarah M.

Citation: 562 A.2d 566, 19 Conn.App. 371

Opinion Judge: DALY, J.

Party Name: In re SARAH M. [*]

Attorney: Jane S. Scholl, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, Acting Atty. Gen., and Susan T. Pearlman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant (petitioner)., Thomas F. Gudsnuk, with whom, on the brief, were Barbara L. DeGennaro, Derby, and Tracy L. Ford, Law Student Intern, for a...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before DUPONT, CJ, and DALY and STOUGHTON

Case Date: August 15, 1989

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

562 A.2d 566 (Conn.App. 1989), 7532, In re Sarah M.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 405 U.S. 645 (1972), 70-5014, Stanley v. Illinois
Connecticut - 121 A. 678 (Conn. 1923), Cinque v. Boyd
Connecticut - 294 A.2d 316 (Conn. 1972), Appeal of Kindis
Connecticut - 362 A.2d 532 (Conn. 1975), Anonymous v. Norton
Connecticut - 534 A.2d 1243 (Conn.App. 1987), 5205, In re Shavoughn K.

See all quotations