56 S.E.2d 168 (Ga.App. 1949), 32744, Milam v. Gray

Citation: 56 S.E.2d 168, 80 Ga.App. 356

Party Name: MILAM v. GRAY.

Attorney: The plaintiff further testified, as to the sale, that he made inquiry and the defendant informed him that 'the car was clear, there wasn't anything against it, it belonged to him.' The defendant did not deny this, and further stated, 'I guaranteed the power to sell. I told him it was my car, I to...

Case Date: Friday November 04, 1949

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

56 S.E.2d 168 (Ga.App. 1949), 32744, Milam v. Gray

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 21 S.E. 168 (Ga. 1894), Barnett v. Speir
Georgia - 62 S.E. 96 (Ga.App. 1908), 1,147, Fudge v. Kelly
Georgia - 85 S.E. 100 (Ga. 1915), 306, Dunn v. Beasley
Georgia - 85 S.E. 100 (Ga. 1915), 295, Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. City of Blakely
Georgia - 6 S.E.2d 454 (Ga.App. 1939), 27667, Daughtry v. Georgia Power Co.