56 Cal.2d 208, 26238, Acosta v. Los Angeles County

Citation: 56 Cal.2d 208, 14 Cal.Rptr. 433, 363 P.2d 473

Opinion Judge: [10] White

Party Name: Acosta v. Los Angeles County

Attorney: [7] Freedman, Herscher, Gold & Fox and Daniel M. Herscher for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Lloyd S. Davis, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday July 03, 1961

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

56 Cal.2d 208, 26238, Acosta v. Los Angeles County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Alabama - 139 So. 263 (Ala. 1932), 1 Div. 665, Hill v. Reaves
California - 16 Cal.2d 80, 5385, Gibson v. County of Mendocino
California - 108 Cal.App.2d 701, 14768, Betts v. City & County of San Francisco
California - 124 Cal.App.2d 551, 19932, Loewen v. City of Burbank
California - 149 Cal.App.2d 500, 17214, Van Winkle v. City of King

See all quotations