56 A. 197 (N.H. 1903), Seeton v. Dunbarton

Citation: 56 A. 197, 72 N.H. 269

Opinion Judge: PARSONS

Party Name: Seeton v. Dunbarton

Attorney: Taggart, Tuttle & Burroughs and Martin & Howe (Louis E. Wyman orally), for the plaintiff. Albin & Shurtleff, for the defendants.

Judge Panel: Chase and Walker, JJ., concurred: Bingham, J., concurred in the result, holding that there was evidence that the defect complained of constituted a defective or insufficient sluiceway within the meaning of the statute. Remick, J., dissenting. REMICK

Case Date: Tuesday October 13, 1903

Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court