559 A.2d 1149 (Conn.App. 1989), 7126, Noethe v. Noethe

Citation: 559 A.2d 1149, 18 Conn.App. 589

Opinion Judge: NORCOTT, J.

Party Name: Paul W. NOETHE v. Rosalie G. NOETHE.

Attorney: David J. Ordway, for appellant (plaintiff)., Rosalie Griffith, pro se. David J. Ordway, for the appellant (plaintiff). Rosalie Griffith, pro se, the appellee (defendant).

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before DUPONT, CJ, and STOUGHTON and NORCOTT

Case Date: Tuesday June 13, 1989

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

559 A.2d 1149 (Conn.App. 1989), 7126, Noethe v. Noethe

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 32 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1943), Varanelli v. Luddy
Connecticut - 429 A.2d 837 (Conn. 1980), Kenworthy v. Kenworthy
Connecticut - 435 A.2d 24 (Conn. 1980), Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of Manchester
Connecticut - 440 A.2d 157 (Conn. 1981), Mausch v. City of Hartford
Connecticut - 458 A.2d 393 (Conn. 1983), Town of Middlebury v. Steinmann

See all quotations