557 A.2d 1045 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1989), Lee v. Doe

Citation: 557 A.2d 1045, 232 N.J.Super. 569

Opinion Judge: [10] Stern

Party Name: Brad LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE (a fictitious name), Robert Morgan, Officer James Doe (a fictitious name), Officer Joe Doe (a fictitious name), Camden City Police Department and the City of Camden, i/j/s/a, Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: [7] Console, Marmero, Livolsi, Wood, Curcio, Morelli & Mammano, attorneys for appellant (Edward C. Curcio on the brief).

Case Date: May 08, 1989

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

557 A.2d 1045 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1989), Lee v. Doe

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 32 Cal.3d 197, 31449, Davidson v. City of Westminster
California - 34 Cal.3d 18, 24343, Williams v. State of California
California - 40 Cal.3d 780, 31917, Lopez v. Southern Cal. Rapid Transit Dist.
California - 233 Cal.App.2d 131, 27592, Ne Casek v. City of Los Angeles
California - 175 Cal.App.3d 1111, B008743, Von Batsch v. American Dist. Telegraph Co.

See all quotations