556 P.2d 1 (Ariz. 1976), 12444, Francisco v. State

Citation: 556 P.2d 1, 113 Ariz. 427

Opinion Judge: [10] Hays

Party Name: Edmund FRANCISCO, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Arizona, the Honorable J. Richard Hannah, Judge of the Pima County Superior Court, and the Pima County Superior Court, Respondents.

Attorney: [6] James J. Purcell, Sandra K. Pharo, Papago Legal Services, Sells, for petitioner. [7] Dennis DeConcini, Former Pima County Atty., David G. Dingeldine, Pima County Atty. by David R. Ostapuk, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, for respondents. [8] James T. Van Bergen, William E. Strickland, Tucson, fo...

Case Date: September 28, 1976

Court: Arizona Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

556 P.2d 1 (Ariz. 1976), 12444, Francisco v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 25 U.S.C. § 1321 Assumption By State of Criminal Jurisdiction
US Code - 25 U.S.C. § 1322 Assumption By State of Civil Jurisdiction
US Code - 25 U.S.C. § 1324 Amendment of State Constitutions Or Statutes to Remove Legal Impediment; Effective Date
Federal Cases - Poitra v. Demarrias
Montana - Blackwolf v. District Court of Sixteenth Judicial Dist. In and For Rosebud County, 12167

See all quotations