55 S.E.2d 292 (S.C. 1949), 16262, Burgess v. Belton Mills

Citation: 55 S.E.2d 292, 215 S.C. 364

Opinion Judge: TAYLOR, Justice.

Party Name: BURGESS et al. v. BELTON MILLS et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Watkins & Watkins, of Anderson, for Appellants, cite: As to proceedings before the Industrial Commission being informal, but the Industrial Commission is bound by the fundamental principles of substantive law and is charged with the duty of protecting substantial rights: 71 C. J. 957, 58 ...

Case Date: Wednesday September 14, 1949

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

55 S.E.2d 292 (S.C. 1949), 16262, Burgess v. Belton Mills

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 200 S.E. 727 (S.C. 1939), 14797, Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.
South Carolina - 3 S.E.2d 489 (S.C. 1939), 14898, Jeffers v. Manetta Mills
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 1944), 15686, Branch v. Pacific Mills
South Carolina - 35 S.E.2d 838 (S.C. 1945), 15778, Mack v. Branch 12, Post Exchange, Fort Jackson
South Carolina - 40 S.E.2d 626 (S.C. 1946), 15891, Radcliffe v. Southern Aviation School

See all quotations