55 Cal.App.3d 660, 47768, Hunot v. Superior Court

Citation: 55 Cal.App.3d 660, 127 Cal.Rptr. 703

Opinion Judge: [10] The Court

Party Name: Hunot v. Superior Court

Attorney: [6] Paul, Hastings & Janofsky and Thomas D. Phillips for Petitioners. [7] No appearance for Respondent. [8] Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham and Edwin Duval for Real Party in Interest.

Case Date: February 24, 1976

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

55 Cal.App.3d 660, 47768, Hunot v. Superior Court

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 153 Cal. 669, S. F. 4705, Becker v. Schmidlin
California - 176 Cal. 752, L. A. 5376, Carter v. Superior Court
California - 17 Cal.2d 280, 16357, Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal
California - 28 Cal.2d 61, 17225, Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior Court
California - 33 Cal.2d 908, 19610, City of Pasadena v. City of Alhambra

See all quotations