546 A.2d 947 (Conn.App. 1988), 5905, Hagist v. Washburn

Citation: 546 A.2d 947, 16 Conn.App. 83

Opinion Judge: STOUGHTON, J.

Party Name: Delight A. HAGIST et al. v. Phillip F. WASHBURN et al.

Attorney: Kimberly A. Knox, with whom was Susan M. Cormier, Hartford, for appellants (defendants)., John C. Dunham, Southington, for appellee (named plaintiff). Kimberly A. Knox, with whom was Susan M. Cormier, for the appellants (defendants). John C. Dunham, for the appellee (named plaintiff).

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before BORDEN, STOUGHTON and FOTI

Case Date: September 06, 1988

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

546 A.2d 947 (Conn.App. 1988), 5905, Hagist v. Washburn

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 143 N.E.2d 502 (Ohio Comm. 1956), 43048, State v. Larason
Connecticut - 82 A. 199 (Conn. 1912), Peck v. Mackowsky
Connecticut - 439 A.2d 1086 (Conn. 1982), Mackin v. Mackin
Connecticut - 459 A.2d 100 (Conn. 1983), Peterson v. Town of Oxford
Connecticut - 475 A.2d 331 (Conn.App. 1984), 2358, Russo v. Stepp

See all quotations