545 A.2d 119 (N.J. 1988), State v. Concepcion

Citation: 545 A.2d 119, 111 N.J. 373

Opinion Judge: [10] Per Curiam

Party Name: STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Miguel Angel CONCEPCION, Defendant-Appellant.

Attorney: [7] Michael Critchley argued the cause for appellant (Critchley & Roche, attorneys, Michael Critchley, Luanne M. Peterpaul, and Donald J. McCauley, on the brief).

Case Date: Monday August 08, 1988

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

545 A.2d 119 (N.J. 1988), State v. Concepcion

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Florida - 318 So.2d 502 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1975), X-320, Parker v. State
Florida - 336 So.2d 1261 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1976), Z-107, Williams v. State
Florida - 348 So.2d 670 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1977), 76-1398, O'Berry v. State
Florida - 394 So.2d 544 (Fla.App. 5 Dist. 1981), 79-1052, Marasa v. State
Florida - 444 So.2d 1063 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1984), AR-280, McMullen v. State

See all quotations