541 N.E.2d 1055 (Ohio 1989), 88-1097, Zavisin v. City of Loveland

Citation: 541 N.E.2d 1055, 44 Ohio St.3d 158

Opinion Judge: ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

Party Name: ZAVISIN, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., Appellees.

Attorney: Baden, Jones, Scheper & Crehan Co., L.P.A., and David H. Landis, Hamilton, for appellant. Baden, Jones, Scheper & Crehan Co., L.P.A., and David H. Landis, for appellant., Lindhorst & Dreidame, Leo J. Breslin, Steven E. Martin and Vernon Stiver, for appellees.

Judge Panel: MOYER, C.J., and SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and HERBERT R. BROWN, JJ., concur. HOLMES and WRIGHT, JJ., dissent. WRIGHT, Justice, dissenting. HOLMES, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case Date: August 02, 1989

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

541 N.E.2d 1055 (Ohio 1989), 88-1097, Zavisin v. City of Loveland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 444 N.E.2d 1053 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1981), McCarter v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio - 476 N.E.2d 676 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1984), C-830560, Vogeler v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio - 496 N.E.2d 912 (Ohio 1986), 85-1392, Hungler v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio - 524 N.E.2d 447 (Ohio 1988), 86-504, State ex rel. Bardo v. City of Lyndhurst