54 S.E.2d 806 (S.C. 1949), 16234, Sellers v. Lewis & Holmes Motor Freight Corp.

Citation: 54 S.E.2d 806, 215 S.C. 256

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: SELLERS v. LEWIS & HOLMES MOTOR FREIGHT CORPORATION et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Stevenson & Lindsay, of Bennettsville, for Appellant, cite:As to the order being appealable: 24 S.C. 81. As to appellant being entitled to an order of non-suit: 44 S.E. 574, 66 S.C. 91. As to error on part of trial judge in allowing the complaint to be amended: 47 S.E.2d 725, 212 S.C. 332...

Case Date: Thursday June 30, 1949

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

54 S.E.2d 806 (S.C. 1949), 16234, Sellers v. Lewis & Holmes Motor Freight Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Pennsylvania - 99 A. 741 (Pa. 1916), 476, Hogarty v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 10 S.E. 932 (S.C. 1890), Lilly v. Charlotte, C. & A. R. Co.
South Carolina - 151 S.E. 887 (S.C. 1930), 12842, U.S. Cas. Co. v. State Highway Dept. of South Carolina
South Carolina - 159 S.E. 457 (S.C. 1931), 13187, Ouzts v. State Highway Department
South Carolina - 18 S.E.2d 611 (S.C. 1942), 15364, Kennemore v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.

See all quotations

54 S.E.2d 806 (S.C. 1949), 16234, Sellers v. Lewis &amp; Holmes Motor Freight Corp.

54 S.E.2d 806 (S.C. 1949), 16234, Sellers v. Lewis & Holmes Motor Freight Corp.