54 S.E.2d 800 (S.C. 1949), 16250, Pursley v. Inman

Citation: 54 S.E.2d 800, 215 S.C. 243

Opinion Judge: FISHBURNE, Justice.

Party Name: PURSLEY v. INMAN et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Sinkler, Gibbs & Simons, of Charleston, for Appellant, cite: As to a constitutional amendment concerning any school district not applying to high school districts: 129 S.C. 526, 125 S.E. 138; 136 S.C. 345, 134 S.E. 380; 138 S.C. 445, 136 S.E. 757; 129 S.C. 218, 123 S.E. 834; 211 S.C. 77, ...

Case Date: Thursday August 11, 1949

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

54 S.E.2d 800 (S.C. 1949), 16250, Pursley v. Inman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 125 S.E. 138 (S.C. 1924), 11586, Arnette v. Ford
South Carolina - 134 S.E. 380 (S.C. 1926), 12053, Powell v. Hargrove
South Carolina - 136 S.E. 757 (S.C. 1927), 12153, Hildebrand v. High School Dist. No. 32
South Carolina - 175 S.E. 510 (S.C. 1934), 13887, Tuten v. Bowden
South Carolina - 27 S.E.2d 714 (S.C. 1943), 15580, Doran v. Robertson

See all quotations